Race/Ethnicity
Questions 101-110
Feel free to browse the following questions, some of which may
still await answers. You can then post an answer or counter an answer
that has already been posted. Please read the
guidelines for answering questions
before making a posting.
Previous 10 this topic
area
Next
10 this topic area
THE
QUESTION:
R110: I am a 23-year-old white female graduate student who was
recently visiting a friend living in Mexico. I have very fair skin
and was often referred to in Spanish as "little white girl" or simply
"whitey." My question is: How are these comments meant? I generally
associate them with catcalls in the United States. Do people not
understand they are offensive? Or should they be considered
flattering?
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Travis, Carbondale, IL
ANSWER 1:
As a white woman with a Mexican husband and in-laws, I
have also struggled with this question. My husband insists that when
his father calls me "huera" (white girl), it is not meant to be
offensive, but is merely a descriptive term. He says that anyone
(including other Mexicans) who has particularly white or dark skin is
referred to as "whitey" or "darky," respectively. It seems to be
customary in the Spanish language to refer to people by
distinguishing characteristics (skin color, hair type, body type,
etc., i.e. "skinny") rather than always by their name.
POSTED JUNE 22, 1998
Chris, 24, white female, Long Beach, CA
FURTHER NOTICE:
I am assuming the word you are talking about is "guerra."
If so, do not take offense. I have noticed from my upbringing that
Mexicans often refer to individuals by their characteristics. For
exampe, blacks = "Negros," Asians = "Chinos," thin = "Flaco/a," and
even in my case, fat = "Gordo." I have an aunt who is 100 percent
Hispanic with light hair and skin who is known to us only as "La
Guerra." There is absolutely nothing derogatory intended
POSTED JUNE 26, 1998
Oscar T., Mexican
<oztel@gte.net>, Kailua,
HI
FURTHER NOTICE 2:
Chris's husband (Answer 1) is telling the truth. Most of
the time, Mexicans won't use the name of a person, but a nickname,
and many nicknames come from the person's physical appearance. This
is true even if the two involved don't know each other (as long as it
is an informal situation). My father, for example, will call anyone
shorter than he "chaparrito" (shorty), and he has always referred to
me as "flaco" (skinny) even though I am not anymore! And once at a
gas station, the attendant called me "guerito" (whitey or blondy)
even though his skin was fairer than mine. So you aren't being
name-called or cat-called. It's just the usual way we talk, and it's
not meant to be offensive at all.
POSTED JULY 16, 1998
Francisco, 23, Mexican
<fjortiz@usa.net>,
Guadalajara, México
FURTHER NOTICE 3:
A question: Would this practice of referring to one in
accordance with one's physical appearance extend to physical
abnormalities? For example, would someone in a wheelchair be called
the Mexican equivalent of "cripple"? Or would a disfigured women be
named "ugly"?
POSTED JULY 26, 1998
Marcia, 43, white, Venice , FL
FURTHER NOTICE 4:
It seems that a lot of "foreign cultures" do what you
described. I know several societies, from Asian to European, etc.,
that describe people by their ethnicity. In addition, when a person
talks that way, he also usually carries a lot of stereotypes
regarding race in his speech. You obviously don't find as much of
that here in the United States because of the diversity here. I've
been told by some "foreign" friends that they're quite apprehensive
and admire Americans in how they deal with people of other
ethnicities. A European company, for example, recently announced that
it is seeking Americans in leadership positions because of their
ability to handle different types of people. That corporation's
obviously generalizing, but it does show a benefit of growing up
American.
POSTED JULY 28, 1998
Jason
<jason@spyring.com>, Bay
Area , CA
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R109: If you could guess, what percentage of black people smoke
marijuana? Same for black females and black males.
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Mark W., 23
<wallacem@slu.edu>, St.
Louis, MO
ANSWER 1:
I would say between 70 percent and 85 percent of blacks
smoke marijuana. I believe this because my friends and associates
smoke it every chance they get.
POSTED OCT. 6, 1998
Naomi, 19, black
<gauldinn@pilot.msu.edu>,
Lansing, MI
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R108: Being a scientist, I've often wondered: Is it possible there
is a physical difference between the races that would allow certain
races to perform better at certain sports? For example, how many
world-class sprinters are white?
Casey, 22, white, Reston, VA
ANSWER 1:
A lot of people think so. However, one must be very
careful not to ask this question in the wrong way. Just ask "Jimmy
the Greek."
POSTED MARCH 29, 1998
Tim, Canton, MI
FURTHER NOTICE:
Like it or not, here in the United States Negroids were
specifically bred for the qualities desired by their owners
(strength, stamina and size being principal among these). The result
of this generations-long program of selective breeding speaks for
itself (Ali, Jordan, Jesse Owens, Jim Brown, Ken Griffey Jr. - need I
say more?). These people, among countless other American Negroids,
will dominate any sport they care to engage in. All other races
(including African Negroids) must take a back seat.
POSTED SEPT. 1, 1998
Dan (white) and Chuck (white), Newport News, VA
FURTHER NOTICE 2:
All of the world-class sprinters were white until a few
decades ago, when black athletes were allowed to enter the lists.
Those who are excluded from expressing their abilities in one sport
will gravitate toward another. Blacks had been excluded from most
sports, but, as one venue after another began to open up, blacks
would concentrate on those sports in which they had role models. Just
look at the number of blacks (and young people) who are suddenly
interested in golf now that Tiger Woods has shown the way. To excel
in sports requires an enormous amount of hard work. Searching for a
racial anatomical difference belittles the training and practice
these athletes undergo. After black sprinters began to win races, the
press mused that perhaps blacks were good at sprinting, but that
whites were better suited for distance running. Then blacks began to
win marathons. The old myths developed to explain away black
successes do not stand up to analysis.
POSTED DEC. 21, 1998
R. Stewart, black
<rostew@aol.com>, Chicago,
IL
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R107: What do white men find attractive in women? In particular,
what part of the female anatomy do they look at first?
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Jeff S., 42, black
<starlites@aol.com>
Pensacola, FL
ANSWER 1:
I cannot speak for everyone, but as a person with a
"roving eye," I always notice legs. Long, shapely, lean legs, to me,
are a real turn-on. Then I will check out the face. What is important
to me are seductive, youthful features. I do not pay particular
attention to breasts. In fact, I prefer smaller ones.
POSTED MARCH 31, 1998
Dan M., 40, Los Angeles, CA
FURTHER NOTICE:
I don't think there's any differences between white guys
and other guys - some guys are attracted by facial features, some
guys are attracted by breasts, butts, legs, whatever.
POSTED MARCH 31, 1998
Alex, 39, white
<aleavens@mindspring.com>
Lawrenceville, GA
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R106: Why don't white people use tissues or handkerchiefs (instead
of bare fingers) to clean their noses? Black people consider this
behavior rude and nasty.
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
M.J., Bloomfield Hills, MI
ANSWER 1:
So do white people. But I find it hard to believe that
only white people pick their noses!
POSTED MARCH 29, 1998
Colette, 32, white
<inkwolf@earthlink.net>
Seymour, WI
FURTHER NOTICE:
I strongly disagree that only white people pick their
noses. I've seen quite a few people practice this, and they weren't
just white. Not all white people pick their nose, either. I for one
think it's disgusting and unsanitary. I prefer all people to use
Kleenexes.
POSTED MARCH 29, 1998
Jessica, white, 21, Orion, MI
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R105: Is the Pontiac Trans Am a type of status symbol in the Arab
countries? Most of them own one of these.
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Johnny B., white, Clinton Township, MI
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R104: Why can't Chaldean men marry black women?
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
J.D., MI
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R103: Given the fact there are three races (Negroid, Caucasian and
Mongoloid), where do Hispanics fall? Also, is "Hispanic" the proper
general term for Spanish descendants, or is "Latino" more
appropriate?
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
B. Williams, Atlanta, GA,
<PEE3000@aol.com>
ANSWER 1:
The problem is not in where each group falls, but in the
original classifications. The "racial"' categories of Negroid,
Caucasian and Mongoloid are actually European classifications, which
have little bearing on reality. For example - where do people of
Middle Eastern descent go in the categories? The classifications have
more to do with prevailing European thought at the time
("Us-white-good, them-black-not good, other
them-yellow-occasionally-useful") than with any real genetic
information. "Race" is really the wrong word to use when discussing
different groups of people, for the simple reason that races cannot
interbreed, or, if they can, will produce sterile offspring. If you
can breed with another animal, then that animal is part of your race
(and vice versa), and since all humans can interbreed, we're all the
same race.
POSTED MARCH 31, 1998
Alex, 39, white
<aleavens@mindspring.com>
Lawrenceville, GA
FURTHER NOTICE:
The latest information from anthropologists is that there
is only one race (homo sapiens) and that the "races" you mention are
actually social constructs made up sometime in the 1920s for
stereotyping purposes. In other words, there's just the human
race.
POSTED MARCH 31, 1998
Joan, San Francisco, CA
FURTHER NOTICE 2:
Additionally, what are called races based on geography are
often extremely diverse or currently exist nowhere near where they
once were. Archaeologists have found and documented people in the
isolated regions of what is now China who have red hair, tartan/plaid
clothing, riding horses, light eyes and torcs for jewelry. In other
words, they are like Celtics, very much similar to the people who
were in the British Isles at the time of Rome's invasion. There are
also strong cultural and artistic ties connecting ancient peoples of
what is now Iran and Northern India with the Celts. Much of what is
considered Germanic came from deep in Russia, perhaps from even
farther away in what are now the "XXX-stan" countries, and were
pushed out by the Mongols, who were right behind, wreaking havoc.
People got around and interbred a lot more than the 1800s prejudical,
white-leisured classes would have wanted to know.
POSTED APRIL 16, 1998
Brendon, 26, Buffalo, NY
FURTHER NOTICE 3:
There are actually four "races": Caucasoid, Negroid,
Mongoloid and Australioid. Hispanic people are a mixture of three of
these, in one proportion or another. They are Caucasoid (from whoever
came over to screw it up for the natives) Negroid (from the slaves
that the Caucasoids brought with them) and Mongoloids (who had
arrived 40,000 years earlier and established themselves as the
natives).This proportion will vary from person to person in the
Hispanic gene pool.
POSTED SEPT. 1, 1998
Dan, white male, Newport News, Va
FURTHER NOTICE 4:
I believe Alex has confused the term "race" with
"species." Two members of different races are still members of the
same species. Even animals exhibit racial and geographical
differences but belong to the same species and could produce
offspring.
POSTED SEPT. 10, 1998
Elaine C.,
<eoder1@compulinx-net.net,>
Columbus, OH
FURTHER NOTICE 5:
Hispanic and Latino both refer to a culture and are not
racial terms. There are Latinos of all types. The president of Peru
is an Asian Latino named Alberto Fujimori. The president of Argentina
is an Arab Latino. Latino is usually preferred because it designates
the region and reflects its diversity. Hispanic makes it sound like
we are all immigrants from Spain, when in fact most of us are
indigenous.
DEC. 18, 1998
A.C.C., Mexican and Indian, or Latino, San Antonio , TX
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R102: Is it true that men in Middle Eastern countries feel that
women are for procreating, and thus for sexual pleasure they (the
men) will be with other men?
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Christopher S., 28, gay, white, Seattle
To respond
BACK TO TOP
THE
QUESTION:
R101: I'm attracted to the church services I've seen in which the
congregations are African American. So far, I've only seen televised
services because I'm not sure if it's OK for whites to attend. I know
it probably depends on the particular congregation or location (I
live in Seattle), but generally, would it be uncomforable for others
or considered improper if I attended?
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Ward W., 49, white, Seattle
ANSWER 1:
Any church I have attended would welcome you just as it
would any other attendee. It is the Lord's house, so it would not be
uncomfortable or improper for you to attend, so please don't
hesitate! By the way, I lived in Seattle for a year, and the two
churches I visited while there had white members and visitors each
time I was there.
POSTED MARCH 28, 1998
Claire D., black, Stone Mountain, GA
FURTHER NOTICE:
I'm a white woman who belongs to two black gospel choirs,
and I have attended many black churches. I can say without hesitation
that I am always welcomed in a very warm way. At times, I do feel
curiosity about my presence there, but I'm sure that would occur if I
were a new black person as well. Be prepared to introduce yourself,
and ask yourself if you will be comfortable if you are the only white
person in attendance that Sunday. If you decide to go, I think you
will find a rich experience awaiting you. There are a lot of
differences (in rituals, in music, in congregational responses)
between the black churches I have attended and the white ones. Keep
an open mind, enjoy the experience and try to join in as much as
possible with clapping, singing along, etc., if "the spirit moves
you."
POSTED MARCH 31, 1998
Joan, San Francisco, CA
To respond
BACK TO TOP